شركة ريفكــــــوRefco واخر الاخبار ..............وبشرى خير عن قريب

**آل علوان** · 08-08-2006, Tue 9:43 AM

هل ستعلن الشركة بكاملها وشركه ألام إفلاسها!!!!!!

ويقال الذي أفلس هو قسم الفيوتشرز..اما قسم العملات فلا..بل بالعكس فليس عليه ولا دولار ديون..
ولكن بلا شك سيتأثر من ماحصل للشركة الام..وقسم العملات الأن يستقبل العديد من الطلبات من عديد من البنوك والمجموعات الماليه
لشراء هذا القسم..وفور مايتم شراء القسم سيتم بأذن الله فك القيود عن الحسابات
ويقااال
اما بخصوص الشركات الكبرى.. فأذا افلست شركة مثل ريفكو فلماذا لاتفلس شركة
مثل اف اكس سليوشن اللتي لاتقارن لا من قريب ولا من بعيد بشركة ريفكو..وللعلم اف اكس سليوشن راس مالها خمس ملايين دولار ونصف.. وهي عبارة عن مجموعة من الموضفين قرابة العشرين , ولو فتحت معهم حساب بمليون دولار ستعاني الكثير والكثير في تنفيذ العمليات او في بعض الأحيان قد لاتستطيع التداول لعدم قدرتهم على تنفيذ عقود ضخمه جدا.

توقعاتكم لموعد الصرف حسب ما وصلني ان الصرف قريباً باذن الله
خاصة بعد ما قامت الشركه بطلب العملاء لحصر مستحقاتهم لدى الشركه
_____________________________________

آخر الاخبار

NEW YORK - A buyout group lead by former Goldman Sachs & Co. banker Christopher Flowers dropped its $768 million bid late Monday for beleaguered Refco Inc.'s futures brokerage business, as competition for the unit heated up.

ADVERTISEMENT

The change of heart came after U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert D. Drain indi***ed at a hearing that he would approve bidding procedures for an auction of the futures business only if it included a significantly lower breakup fee of $5 million for the Flowers group and expense reimbursement of only $1 million for the buyout group.

James Sprayregen, a lawyer for Flowers, told the court that the group had already spent "far more than that" on its bid.

"With regret, we're not able to proceed," Sprayregen said. Sprayregen and Flowers both declined to comment after the hearing.

Earlier Monday, the Flowers group indi***ed it would agree to a $15 million breakup fee and a reimbursement cap of $5 million, down from a fee equal to 2.8 percent of the purchase price of any rival winning bid.

The decision by the Flowers group leaves Refco without a "stalking horse" in its effort to sell its regulated futures business.

However, a new lead bidder could quickly emerge as five new groups indi***ed on Monday they had an interest in bidding for all or part of the futures business.

Rival futures brokerage firm Man Financial; Marathon Asset Management LLC; and DIGL Inc., a Delaware corporation formed by Dubai Investment Group LLC and Yucaipa Cos. LLC, all spelled out their interest in filings with the bankruptcy court in Manhattan.

Merrill Lynch & Co. lawyer James Bromley also said the bank has lodged a bid joined by Warburg Pincus LLC and Susquehanna, but gave no details. And a lawyer for Apollo Management, led by ex-Drexel banker Leon Black, said it too may bid.

DIGL's bid would have topped the Flowers bid by $60 million. Interactive Brokers, an options trading and brokerage firm that previously bid on the unit, lodged a new bid Monday that would top the DIGL offer by $30 million.

J. Gregory Milmoe, Refco's lawyer, declined to comment late Monday on what the Flowers group decision will mean for the potential auction of the futures unit.

Earlier Monday, potential bidders had agreed with Refco for the auction to be Nov. 9, with bids for the unit due five days before that. Under that plan, the auction would be run by Greenhill & Co., Refco's advisers, and a hearing on the sale would take place Nov. 10. However, the bankruptcy court still has to sign off on any revised bidding procedures before the auction can begin.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates futures brokers, would not comment on the Flowers group's abdi***ion or on whether it would try to arrange a transfer of customer assets from Refco to another broker.

Refco Inc. and 23 affiliates filed for bankruptcy Oct. 17, shortly after Phillip R. Bennett, its president and chief executive, was arrested and charged with securities fraud in connection with what prosecutors said was a scheme to hide $430 million in debt owed to Refco by a separate company he controlled.

The regulated futures brokerage units that have drawn the most interest from bidders — Refco LLC, Refco Overseas Ltd. and Refco Singapore — didn't file for bankruptcy, but their sale still requires the approval of the court.

Parties met Monday in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York for a hearing on Refco's request to open an auction for the units and to approve bidding procedures that would require rivals to bid in cash and pay the Flowers group a breakup fee if a rival bid prevails.

Judge Drain, who is hearing the case, said in court that he was "troubled" by the nature of the breakup fee and opposed any provision that would give the Flowers group a chance to match the best bid arising from an auction. The comments were likely welcome to creditors, who want to see a vigorous auction and a higher price than Flowers is offering.

Refco is pushing for a quick sale of the units before their business falls apart. That business appears to have shrunk by more than half in just two weeks.

In court Monday, Milmoe, the Refco lawyer, said customer accounts at the units have shrunk to $3.4 billion. Last week, Milmoe said the accounts stood at $4.1 billion, down from $7.5 billion before the company began to melt down.

Even so, potential bidders and creditors objected strenuously to Refco's suggested auction procedures Monday, saying they favored the Flowers group at their expense.

"The bid procedures, in their present form, will chill the bidding and decrease the likelihood of obtaining the highest and best consideration for the debtors' estates," Wells Fargo & Co. said in a filing.

Wells Fargo is the trustee for $600 million in bonds due in 2012. The breakup fee for the Flowers group embedded in bidding rules sought by Refco would ensure debtors never receive more than 97.2 percent of the final purchase price of the units, Wells Fargo said.

Refco had asked the court to require bidders competing with Flowers to pay a breakup fee of 2.8 percent of the winning bid, cover $5 million in expenses and top the Flowers bid by at least $20 million.

Anticipating an increase in the purchase price, Refco had said in a filing that the Flowers group would have been willing to pay anything over $900 million required to purchase the units in unsecured notes.